RE: virtual memory

From: Veverka, Filip (Filip.Veverka@arrow.cz)
Date: 25. 03. 2003, 17:35 CET

Next message: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: Virus"

Previous message: Tomas Rozek: "OT: Dotaz na Pocket LOOX"
Maybe in reply to: Simona: "virtual memory"
Next in thread: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: virtual memory"
Reply: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: virtual memory"
Reply: KAB / Konference: "Re: virtual memory"
Reply: h! y n e k . l i p a: "Re: virtual memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Takovy laicky dotaz:)     1) pokud mam malo fyzicke RAM, jak hodne je
system schopen
vystacit si s virtualni pameti ? Je mi jasne, ze to neni plnohodnotna
nahrada, ale
v cem je nevyhoda (nebo problem) ?   2) hrozi pri swapovani nejake
realne nebezpeci napr. vetsiho opotrebeni (tj. poskozeni) disku apod.?
Diky,
FV

> -----Original Message-----
> From: h! y n e k . l i p a [mailto:hynek.lipa@worldonline.cz] 
 
> ja osobne jsem na XP vytvoril jednu partisnu o velikosti 2GB 
> (to je plytvani co ;) ) a systemu jsem rekl, ze tady je jeho 
> pisecek, tam si muze hrat a zadne omezeni nema (no jen 
> velikosti part.). tak si vytvoril 1,6GB pagefile a je happy 
> :) a ja taky

Next message: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: Virus"

Previous message: Tomas Rozek: "OT: Dotaz na Pocket LOOX"
Maybe in reply to: Simona: "virtual memory"
Next in thread: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: virtual memory"
Reply: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: virtual memory"
Reply: KAB / Konference: "Re: virtual memory"
Reply: h! y n e k . l i p a: "Re: virtual memory"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : 25. 03. 2003, 17:35 CET