Re: zip versus tar.gz

From: Paco (paco@seznam.cz)
Date: 17. 07. 2002, 23:18 CEST

Previous message: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: zip versus tar.gz"
In reply to: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: zip versus tar.gz"
Next in thread: Tomas Kozeluh: "RE: zip versus tar.gz"
Next in thread: Petr Kudrhalt: "Re: zip versus tar.gz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Místo přípon .tar.gz lze použít i jednu příponu .tgz . V Linuxu není
> počet přípon omezen, ve Windows více přípon občas dělá psí kusy.
> Kit

I ve Win je pouzivani vice extenzi vcelku bezne, sam to
velmi casto a zcela bez potizi pouzivam a zatim mi to
zadny psi kus nevyvedlo. :)

pako Paco. 


______________________________________________________________________
Reklama:
Jake bude pocasi? http://pocasi.seznam.cz

Previous message: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: zip versus tar.gz"
In reply to: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: zip versus tar.gz"
Next in thread: Tomas Kozeluh: "RE: zip versus tar.gz"
Next in thread: Petr Kudrhalt: "Re: zip versus tar.gz"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 17. 07. 2002, 23:18 CEST