RE: Norton Ghost nebo Drive Image?

From: mr.solveproblems (mr.solveproblems@hotPOP.com)
Date: 01. 11. 2003, 09:49 CET

Previous message: mr.solveproblems: "RE: Norton Ghost nebo Drive Image?"
Maybe in reply to: mr.solveproblems: "RE: Norton Ghost nebo Drive Image?"
Next in thread: mr.solveproblems: "RE: Norton Ghost nebo Drive Image?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

No to byl mozna muj pripad! Za hodinu vyrobil cca 2% z HDD a dal
porad nic, deeeeeeesne pomalej, jsem si spocital ze tenhle squelej
nastroj by zalohoval HDD asi 10let ;o)

 Ani DI 2002 nie je bez chyby, 
> ten hajzlik niekedy bezi pocas klonovania v nejakom ultra low 
> speed rezime asi tak 150 MB / min...no tu uz mi je len direct 
> IDE rychlost, inokedy PRESNE!! s tou istou HW konfiguraciou 
> fahci na 1600MB / min.  Takisto nezvlada hromadne klonovanie

Previous message: mr.solveproblems: "RE: Norton Ghost nebo Drive Image?"
Maybe in reply to: mr.solveproblems: "RE: Norton Ghost nebo Drive Image?"
Next in thread: mr.solveproblems: "RE: Norton Ghost nebo Drive Image?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 01. 11. 2003, 09:49 CET