RE: Re(2x): sestava

From: Snehulak <snehulak (zavinac)>
Date: 12. 10. 2004, 07:49 CEST
Reaguju jeste na to , ze na athlonu 64 pujdou samozrejme 32b windows :)
dopln si znalosti  . a taky se podivej na nejake recenze na tomshardware
je tam primo srovnani Athlon 64 vs P 4 asi budes prekvapen , ze
technologicky je Athlon 64 nekde jinde nez topici slepa vetev vyvoje jak
uznal sam intel P4 se stropem nekde na 4ghz . 



http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040106/index.html

toto je z toho hodnoceni clanku :) To byly jeste stare revize 130nm ted
uz se delaj jenom 90nm ty jsou na tom daleko lip clanek o nich tam
nemuzu najit.

//That also goes to show that the 64-bit Athlon stands to gain a lot
from increased clock speeds. For now, however, we're dubious that
there'll be an Athlon64 with 2.4 GHz based on 130 nm; 90 nm seems more
probable.

That leaves us with a clear description of the Athlon64 3400+: it's a
top quality CPU that's especially suitable for games and that also lives
up to its model name - albeit only in this category. At the end of the
day, it still lags slightly behind the Pentium 4, a deficit that the
64-bit architecture could compensate for in the medium term, however. In
the short term, Cool & Quiet could do the job, as Intel doesn't offer
this type of energy management for desktop processors yet. We can only
hope that the motherboard makers take note. //

nooo jinak porovnani opteron 250vs xeon 3.6ghz uz ma jasny titulek AMD
is winning :P

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040927/index.html

jo intel je  v poho 2mb cache se hodi , ale uz to neni takova jednicka
jak byvala holt casy se meni 

snehulak 


> >
> >Jestli to chces na hrani tak tam nekupuj 5200 dyt je to 
> pomaly smejd na 
> >dnesni pomery :) A tech 512mb ram je taky uz nic moc minimalne na to 
> >hrani . A vubec na co P4 proc ne za stejnou cenu Athlon 64, ktery je 
> >lepsi s mensi spotrebou a zastejne prachy s tim, ze ma vetsi 
> potencial 
> >do budoucna.
> >
> >Snehulak
> >
> Athlon 64 :DDDDD no nevim nevim.... Mozna zadarmo...
Received on Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:49:38 +0200

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12. 10. 2004, 07:49 CEST