Reaguju jeste na to , ze na athlonu 64 pujdou samozrejme 32b windows :) dopln si znalosti . a taky se podivej na nejake recenze na tomshardware je tam primo srovnani Athlon 64 vs P 4 asi budes prekvapen , ze technologicky je Athlon 64 nekde jinde nez topici slepa vetev vyvoje jak uznal sam intel P4 se stropem nekde na 4ghz . http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040106/index.html toto je z toho hodnoceni clanku :) To byly jeste stare revize 130nm ted uz se delaj jenom 90nm ty jsou na tom daleko lip clanek o nich tam nemuzu najit. //That also goes to show that the 64-bit Athlon stands to gain a lot from increased clock speeds. For now, however, we're dubious that there'll be an Athlon64 with 2.4 GHz based on 130 nm; 90 nm seems more probable. That leaves us with a clear description of the Athlon64 3400+: it's a top quality CPU that's especially suitable for games and that also lives up to its model name - albeit only in this category. At the end of the day, it still lags slightly behind the Pentium 4, a deficit that the 64-bit architecture could compensate for in the medium term, however. In the short term, Cool & Quiet could do the job, as Intel doesn't offer this type of energy management for desktop processors yet. We can only hope that the motherboard makers take note. // nooo jinak porovnani opteron 250vs xeon 3.6ghz uz ma jasny titulek AMD is winning :P http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040927/index.html jo intel je v poho 2mb cache se hodi , ale uz to neni takova jednicka jak byvala holt casy se meni snehulak > > > >Jestli to chces na hrani tak tam nekupuj 5200 dyt je to > pomaly smejd na > >dnesni pomery :) A tech 512mb ram je taky uz nic moc minimalne na to > >hrani . A vubec na co P4 proc ne za stejnou cenu Athlon 64, ktery je > >lepsi s mensi spotrebou a zastejne prachy s tim, ze ma vetsi > potencial > >do budoucna. > > > >Snehulak > > > Athlon 64 :DDDDD no nevim nevim.... Mozna zadarmo...Received on Tue, 12 Oct 2004 07:49:38 +0200
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12. 10. 2004, 07:49 CEST