Re: OT:) Re: Ot zkus doba

From: J. Polivka (jpolivka@mbox.vol.cz)
Date: 05. 09. 2003, 06:52 CEST

Previous message: petr.novak@vitana.cz: "Re: Zobrazovani slozek"
In reply to: strma: "OT:) Re: Ot zkus doba"
Next in thread: ludvil1.edu@mail.cez.cz: "Re: Ot zkus doba"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ja take :-))), ale prislo mi, ze autor byl nejak hodne mimo.
Ja zas temer ve stejne dobe napsal jednomu zakaznikovi, ze prilohu ma v DPH
mist v PDF.
Nikdo nejsme neomylny.
Doufam, ze i dotycny autor to vzal s humorem.
Jindra Polivka
jpolivka@mbox.vol.cz

> a je nejaky pravidlo ze do konve se musi psat zastrizliva? ;)
> jestli jo, tak sem ho prave porusil ;)))
> Dismissed.
>
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 20:20:28 +0200, J. Polivka <jpolivka@mbox.vol.cz>
wrote:
>
> >
> > A psal jsi tento prispevek skutecne strizlivy ???
> > J. Polivka
> > jpolivka@mbox.vol.cz

Previous message: petr.novak@vitana.cz: "Re: Zobrazovani slozek"
In reply to: strma: "OT:) Re: Ot zkus doba"
Next in thread: ludvil1.edu@mail.cez.cz: "Re: Ot zkus doba"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : 05. 09. 2003, 06:52 CEST