Re: aky FS vo Win2000/XP?

From: snehulak (snehulak@izs-br.cz)
Date: 06. 08. 2002, 12:21 CEST

Previous message: Likavcan, Alexander: "WXP vs W98 was: Vypinani WinXP Prof. CZ"
In reply to: Mirex: "Re: aky FS vo Win2000/XP?"
Next in thread: Sokol: "Re: aky FS vo Win2000/XP?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> > Cigas Marian:
> >
> > Otazka asi na Mirexa: ak chce niekto strihat video v OS Win2000/XP, aky
FS
> > je lepsie pouzit? NTFS, alebo FAT32?
>
> ja by som dal (ja mam) FAT32 z mnohych uz menovanych dovodov.
> rozdiely nie su priepastne ale ja ich citim. NTFS ma dlhsiu
> odpoved ked sa robi, napriklad ak presuniem folder s
> tisickami suborov z miesta na miesto, FAT32 to je hned,
> NTFS trva aj niekolko (aj desiatok) sekund. Na to sa im
> mozem ***
>
> Mirex.

Jo urcite FAT32 je rychlejsi .NTFS je provazane pravy a tak a o to je
pomalejsi.

Previous message: Likavcan, Alexander: "WXP vs W98 was: Vypinani WinXP Prof. CZ"
In reply to: Mirex: "Re: aky FS vo Win2000/XP?"
Next in thread: Sokol: "Re: aky FS vo Win2000/XP?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 06. 08. 2002, 12:21 CEST