Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)

From: pavel@pilsen.cz
Date: 18. 03. 2002, 12:31 CET

Previous message: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: No comment 2... (a jeste OS)"
In reply to: Tomas Krause: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Next in thread: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> A jen mala poznamka zaverem: porad se tu bavime o _vyvojove verzi_ a
> bylo by asi rozumne hodnotit az verzi 1.0 nebo jeste lepe 1.1.
> tomas.krause.cz

trochu problem ale je, ze mozilla je "ve vyvoji" uz delsi dobu....:)
mrkvosoft za tu dobu stihne udelat 3 verze (a spoustu updatu, patchu a
servis packu), u kterych se casem taky najdou chyby a bezpecnostni
diry. msie je taky "ve vyvoji", ale je oznacenej jako finalni verze, i
kdyz jeho fce nekdy vyvolavaji vetsi problemy nez "vyvojovy verze"
mozilly... imho je jen rozdil v oznaceni.
------------------------------
pavel >pavel@pilsen.cz<

Previous message: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: No comment 2... (a jeste OS)"
In reply to: Tomas Krause: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Next in thread: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 18. 03. 2002, 12:30 CET