Re[2]: No comment... (and NO flame...)

From: Jiri Matejka (matejka@runway.cz)
Date: 18. 03. 2002, 00:58 CET

Previous message: Jiri Matejka: "Re[2]: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
In reply to: Ruprecht: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Next in thread: Tomas Krause: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Next in thread: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Mne proste prekvapuje, ze pro nekoho muze byt hlavni prednosti nejakyho
> softu jen a pouze to, ze neni od MS. Ze s nim 2/3 veci na soucasnym netu
> budou zmrseny, to uz je mu asi putna. Hlavne ze ma 'alternativu'. :((

a jeste neco - koukni se po cizich webech, a uvidis uz dost casto
ikonky ktere hlasaji ze ty stranky maji HTML a CSS dle W3C

Jirka

Previous message: Jiri Matejka: "Re[2]: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
In reply to: Ruprecht: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Next in thread: Tomas Krause: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Next in thread: Ing. Vlastimil Pospíchal: "Re: No comment... (and NO flame...)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 18. 03. 2002, 00:58 CET