Re: SB 128 alebo Player 5.1

• Previous message: Miro Vesely: "Re: MTU ve WinXP"
• In reply to: Jan Starosta: "SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Next in thread: Jan Starosta: "Re: SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Next in thread: Cigas Marian: "RE: SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Reply: Jan Starosta: "Re: SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Jan Starosta:
>  
> SB 128 PCI alebo SB Player 5.1
> Player stoji 1400 sk bez DPH, 128ka polovicu z toho. Ide mi o to ci je
> potrebne mat Live, odrazi sa to ak to clovek pouziva na grabovanie
> hudby, mp3 a pod.

grabovanie hudby z CD predsa nejde cez kartu, tam ti to
je jedno...

> Je ten zvuk aspon o poznanie lepsi ci nie?

oproti Live nie. oproti audigy o zrnko ano, ale
asi to aj tak nerozoznas :)

> (vlastnost priestoroveho zvuku by som nechal bokom

potom SB 128 PCI, za posledny tyzden som instaloval
do niekolkych strojov. spokojnost u vsetkych zakaznikov.
co usetrili na Livke, to vrazili do debniciek SW320
a velmi sa tesia.

> Nie su s niektorou kartou problemy?

ziadne som nikdy nevidel

> (prevadzkovana bude na DURON700/VIA

joj, to neviem. s via chipsetom niekedy byvaju
problemy. ale jeho zastanci vravia, ze nie. ja vzdy
davam ludom normalne bordy, ak chcu via, alebo
nebodaj AMD, nedodavam. nemam cas laborovat a
stale dvihat telefon, preco to blbne

Mirex. 
 
-- 

www.mix.sk 

piatok, 7. december 2001, 9:20

• Previous message: Miro Vesely: "Re: MTU ve WinXP"
• In reply to: Jan Starosta: "SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Next in thread: Jan Starosta: "Re: SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Next in thread: Cigas Marian: "RE: SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Reply: Jan Starosta: "Re: SB 128 alebo Player 5.1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 07. 12. 2001, 09:45 CET