Re: FAT32 or NTFS

From: Miro Vesely (mirex@internet.sk)
Date: 26. 09. 2001, 08:45 CEST

Previous message: Mikulas Hypr: "Re: USB?"
In reply to: Petr Kudrhalt: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Next in thread: Miro Vesely: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Petr Kudrhalt:
>  
> muj nazor
> mit fat32 na NT systemu je jako mit bavorak 735 a v nem sedacky ze skodovky
> 125;-)))

nie, je to ako mat kolobezku s tryskovym motorom. FAT32 ide
rychlejsie pri praci s velkymi subormi. Mozu byt situacie,
kedy je NTFS rychlejsia (programatori vraveli ze kompilacia
bezi radovo rychlejsie, nez na FAT)

mozno by to chcelo zmenit velkost klustrikov na NTFS a asi
by to fungovalo rychlo

Mirex. 
 
-- 

www.mix.sk 

streda, 26. septembra 2001, 8:42

Previous message: Mikulas Hypr: "Re: USB?"
In reply to: Petr Kudrhalt: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Next in thread: Miro Vesely: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 26. 09. 2001, 08:59 CEST