Re: FAT32 or NTFS

From: Miro Vesely (mirex@internet.sk)
Date: 24. 09. 2001, 18:33 CEST

Previous message: +RICCI+: "FAT32 or NTFS"
In reply to: +RICCI+: "FAT32 or NTFS"
Next in thread: pavel@pilsen.cz: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Reply: pavel@pilsen.cz: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> +RICCI+:
>  
> Preferuju rychlost pred bezpecnosti. Zda se mi totiz, ze pokud system
> naistaluji na NTFS pracuje pomaleji...
> Jak to vidite vy?

to iste, uz asi rok. NTFS mi nesmie na disk. nehovoriac
o tom, ze ak za stane nieco vazne, NTFS sa zle zachranuje,
malo nastrojov

Mirex. 
 
-- 

www.mix.sk 

pondelok, 24. septembra 2001, 18:32

Previous message: +RICCI+: "FAT32 or NTFS"
In reply to: +RICCI+: "FAT32 or NTFS"
Next in thread: pavel@pilsen.cz: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Reply: pavel@pilsen.cz: "Re: FAT32 or NTFS"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 24. 09. 2001, 19:04 CEST