Re: 128 RAM

From: KAB (konference@kab.cz)
Date: 24. 03. 2001, 11:47 CET

Previous message: PokornyJ@atlas.cz: "Re: AMR"
In reply to: PokornyJ@atlas.cz: "Re: 128 RAM"
Next in thread: j.c.: "Re: 128 RAM"
Reply: j.c.: "Re: 128 RAM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> muj znamy (odbornik prez pocitace...prej:-)tvrdi, ze kdyz nekdo ma
> naistalovany Win 98, tak nema smysl mit vetsi RAM nez 128. Win 98 
> pry vetsi nedokaze vyuzit..... Co Vy na to ?

Docela by me zajimalo, jak na to prisel? Oduvodnil ti to nejak? 
Mozna ze cetl nekde nejaky blabol a uveril mu, ale tohle je
prece nesmysl. 
KAB

Previous message: PokornyJ@atlas.cz: "Re: AMR"
In reply to: PokornyJ@atlas.cz: "Re: 128 RAM"
Next in thread: j.c.: "Re: 128 RAM"
Reply: j.c.: "Re: 128 RAM"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 04. 09. 2001, 06:03 CEST