Re: FAT 32

From: Miro Vesely (mirex@internet.sk)
Date: 10. 03. 2000, 13:02 CET

Previous message: Miro Vesely: "Re: FAT 32"
In reply to: Oldřich: "FAT 32"
Next in thread: Spock: "Re: FAT 32"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Prevest u W98 na FAT 32 - ano, ci ne? V literature - asi ano, ale...
> Praxe ? Dekuji. Oldrich

ano. mensi vyskyt chyb ako stratene klustre a podobne voloviny.
Ak neexperimentujes s desiatimi operakmi, ktore fat32 nepoznaju,
tak prejdi na FAT32, je lepsia.

mensia alokacna jednotka moze pri praci s velkymi subormi
nepatrne zpomalit pristup. Ak nahravas video, alebo audio.
Ale mne to zatial neprekazalo. Nemozem proti FAT32 ani pipnut.
Ziadne problemy, ani systemovy disk uz netreba, staci prislusne
subory normalne nakopirovat a ides... Fat16 je mrtvola, podobne,
ako operaky, ktore nepoznaju FAT32

Bye Mirex
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
mirex@internet.sk      www.mix.sk      tel: 0903  231 551

Previous message: Miro Vesely: "Re: FAT 32"
In reply to: Oldřich: "FAT 32"
Next in thread: Spock: "Re: FAT 32"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 04. 09. 2001, 00:31 CEST