Re: FAT 32

From: KAB (konference@kab.cz)
Date: 10. 03. 2000, 10:12 CET

Previous message: Pavel Hrabal: "Re: Rychlost stahovani dat"
In reply to: Spock: "Re: FAT 32"
Next in thread: Ivo Cilich: "Re: FAT 32"
Next in thread: Ivo Cilich: "Re: FAT 32"
Next in thread: Pavel Hrabal: "Re: FAT 32"
Reply: Ivo Cilich: "Re: FAT 32"
Reply: Miro Vesely: "Re: FAT 32"
Reply: Mikulas Hypr: "Re: FAT 32"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> >Prevest u W98 na FAT 32 - ano, ci ne? V literature - asi ano, ale...
> >Praxe ? Dekuji. Oldrich
> 
> praxe bude takova, ze ti kazdy napise neco jineho. mne osobne
> nesmi zadna fat32 sahnout na disky ani paratkem... ;-)

Kdyz uz fakt chces, tak jen na partition s daty. Vyznam to ma ale jen 
v pripade, ze chces usetrit misto na HDD a mas na nem hodne malych 
souboru. 

Btw jsme to minule nejak popletli, takze jak velkou partition s FAT16 
tedy muzu vytvorit?

KAB

Previous message: Pavel Hrabal: "Re: Rychlost stahovani dat"
In reply to: Spock: "Re: FAT 32"
Next in thread: Ivo Cilich: "Re: FAT 32"
Next in thread: Ivo Cilich: "Re: FAT 32"
Next in thread: Pavel Hrabal: "Re: FAT 32"
Reply: Ivo Cilich: "Re: FAT 32"
Reply: Miro Vesely: "Re: FAT 32"
Reply: Mikulas Hypr: "Re: FAT 32"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 04. 09. 2001, 00:30 CEST