Re: 65.000 chyb ve W2K

From: KAB (konference@kab.cz)
Date: 15. 02. 2000, 14:10 CET

Previous message: Lubos Pechacek: "Re: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
In reply to: Galda Jan: "RE: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Next in thread: Miroslav Petricek: "Re: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Next in thread: Galda Jan: "RE: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Next in thread: Adam Rambousek: "Re[2]: klavesove zkratky"
Reply: Miroslav Petricek: "Re: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> Neni to neco POLEMIKA ci snad dokonce neco PLAMENNEHO ?

Spis flame-internet@nawebu.cz :-)) Ale jen tak dal, neni to nezajimavy.

BTW me kvuli stabilite vyhovujou Win NT, i kdyz dostavaji obcas dost
zabrat, jeste se mi nikdy nezhroutily a ani neco takovyho nenaznacily.
Budou-li W2K na tom stejne, jako ze jo, kdyz to puvodne mely byt 
Win NT 5, tak je beru urcite. 
KAB

Previous message: Lubos Pechacek: "Re: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
In reply to: Galda Jan: "RE: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Next in thread: Miroslav Petricek: "Re: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Next in thread: Galda Jan: "RE: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Next in thread: Adam Rambousek: "Re[2]: klavesove zkratky"
Reply: Miroslav Petricek: "Re: 65.000 chyb ve W2K"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03. 09. 2001, 23:01 CEST