Re: znaky >>>

From: Adam Hauner (aha@pinknet.cz)
Date: 02. 12. 1999, 14:45 CET

Previous message: Tomas Krause: "Re: znaky >>>"
In reply to: Tomas Krause: "Re: znaky >>>"
Next in thread: KAB: "Re: znaky >>>"
Next in thread: Petr Slavík: "Re: znaky >>>"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Tomas Krause wrote:

> To je kravina. Je to vec klienta, kterej to ma 'oentrovat' sam. Zadny 
> entry nepisu a vidite snad muj mail v jednom radku? Z mailu co mi chodej, 
> je tak jeden ze sta v jednom radku, takze jasny problem na strane 
> odesilatele.

Pripojuji svuj souhlas a pridavam, ze transportni mailove systemy nemaji
povinnost prenaset radky delsi jak cca 1000 znaku (resp.  limit
presahujici znaky). Presne si to nepamatuji, ale toto byl zhruba vysledek
jedne podobne diskuze...
                                                Adam Hauner

-=[ AHA ]=[ aha@pinknet.cz ]=[ http://postcard.cz - http://alenka.cz ]=-

Previous message: Tomas Krause: "Re: znaky >>>"
In reply to: Tomas Krause: "Re: znaky >>>"
Next in thread: KAB: "Re: znaky >>>"
Next in thread: Petr Slavík: "Re: znaky >>>"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03. 09. 2001, 22:28 CEST