Re: matrix has...

From: Pavel Trubl (trubl@katel.cz)
Date: 04. 09. 2002, 13:16 CEST

Previous message: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
In reply to: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
Next in thread: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
Next in thread: h! y n e k . l i p a: "Re: matrix has..."
Reply: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
>
>vsak ja nechci rozpoutat flame war , ale nejakou diskuzi v cem je co lepsi
>
>... tak by me zajimaly nazory jinych v cem
>

Tyto dve vety si odporuji, protoze ta druha veta flamewar rozpouta :)
P.

Previous message: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
In reply to: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
Next in thread: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
Next in thread: h! y n e k . l i p a: "Re: matrix has..."
Reply: snehulak: "Re: matrix has..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 04. 09. 2002, 13:16 CEST