Re: Nabozenstvi

From: Dusi (dusi@SoftHome.net)
Date: 14. 09. 2000, 11:35 CEST

Previous message: Dusi: "Re: Nabozenstvi"
In reply to: Libal Jiri jr.: "Re: Nabozenstvi"
Next in thread: David: "Takze neco k tomu TEMELINU :) a je to celkem dlouhe :)"
Next in thread: +RICCI+: "Re: Nabozenstvi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dobrý deň Libal Jiri jr.,

Dňa 13. september 2000, o 19:57:31, si o Nabozenstvi napísal:

> I kdyby byl Temelin zabezpecen na 99.99% tak je tu porad 0.0001%
> sance, ze to bouchne - je to sice mala pravdepodobnost ale vyloucit ji
> nemuzeme!!

Nemuzes  vyloucit  ani  havarii dopravniho letadla nebo katastrofu namorni
lodi.  A presto pri nich umira podstatne mene lidi, nez na dopravni nehody
na silnicich.

Nemuzes  vyloucit naprosto nic. Dulezita je mira rizika, kterou si ochoten
pripustit.  Nazory  na jakoukoli vec jsou determinovany mnozstvim a urovni
tvych znalosti o dane problematice.


-- 
Dusi

Previous message: Dusi: "Re: Nabozenstvi"
In reply to: Libal Jiri jr.: "Re: Nabozenstvi"
Next in thread: David: "Takze neco k tomu TEMELINU :) a je to celkem dlouhe :)"
Next in thread: +RICCI+: "Re: Nabozenstvi"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 10. 08. 2001, 14:34 CEST